Saturday, May 13, 2006
GOI should set up an expert commission to evaluate Taj Mahal
It is time to remove the rotten and dried up skeletons of the barbaric muslim thugs who invaded our country and converted our temples as their dirty tombs to insult Hindus. Since the beginning of Islamic history, muslims had invaded and took over Hindu temples starting with the Siva temple in Mecca. This Shiva temple which had 360 idols inside now has only the Siva Lingam left. This temple has Sanskrit inscriptions. The muslims call it the Kaaba. Strangely the muslims go around the Kaaba as per the Hindu customs and worship the Siva Lingam which is nothing but idol worship. Muslims also kiss the Siva Lingam where as Hindus only worship it. The present generation of muslims doesn’t have a scientific temper or analytical mind to investigate the origin of Kaaba but simply follow the Hindu custom of idol worship.
Coming back to India, the recent demand issued by muslim bodies to handover the Taj Mahal to them is surprising. Muslims think and claim that Taj Mahal is a mosque as well as the burial house for the muslim king Shajahan and one of his 5000 wife, by name Mumtaz. The truth is the building is Tejo-mahalaya, or the Shiva temple. This is known to most of the Hindus but as India was ruled Since independence, by persons like Nehru, whose grand father was a muslim, and later by Indira Gandhi who converted to Islam and had the name of Maimuna Begum and married a muslim. These things prevented Hindus from reclaiming the Hindu temples converted to churches, mosques and muslim morgues. After independence, to prevent the claim of Hindus temples like Tejo mahalaya was kept under the custody of ASI, the same way the Hindu temple properties are kept under government control. Today India is controlled by a combination of Italian christian, Indian muslim and Sikh leaders; so that the muslim clergy is bold enough to claim the ownership of Taj Mahal. Muslims say Taj Mahal is a mosque cum muslim morgue and want to control it and collect the income from tourists. But it is time for Hindus to claim back the Siva Temple Tejo-mahalaya and remove those rotten and dried bodies of the muslim thugs who raped and destroyed our nation. The muslim bury their dead in our temples to humiliate Hindus.
It is time for Hindus to claim back all the temples and palaces usurped by the barbaric muslims during their barbaric rule. During the muslim rule, these barbarians had carried out the biggest genocide of Hindus, which is even bigger than the genocide of Jews during the second world war. Hindus should demand an apology from the muslim countries from where the barbaric muslims invaded and destroyed our nation.
One article published by BBC which indicates that the Taj is Hindu temple is given below. Further articles and photos are available in the internet. The government of India should appoint a commission of experts including international experts, to check Hindus’ claim and return the temple back to Hindus. At the time of independence muslims demanded separate Islamic state and got it. During the partition it was genocide of Hindus in many areas. Yet all the muslims did not go to their Islamic nation, but continued in India and was breeding faster than the Pakistan they got. India is no safer for Hindus because of the remaining muslims in India who are carrying out terrorist bombings of our temples and important places. Even in 1971 in Bangladesh, Bangladeshi and Pakistani muslims killed more than 600,000 Hindus and one crore Hindus were driven out to India as refugees. As long as muslims are in India, India is not safe for Hindus. So Indian Government should establish a commission and have the remaining muslims sent back to Pakistan peacefully and take back all the Hindus left in Pakistan and Bangladesh. This will stop the terrorism that we are experiencing on a daily basis. Even our top business leaders are not safe as a terrorist group consisting of Indian and Pakistani muslims who were planning Parliament attack type suicide mission against Bangalore IT firms were shot down in New Delhi. If we don’t resettle muslims by 2060 the fast breeding muslims will become majority in India and cycle of genocide of Hindus will start again. The christians who are now converting with gun the Hindus to Christianity in the northeast should be declared as anti-nationals and there should be a complete ban of conversion of any kind in India to prevent disintegration of our nation..
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A5220Created: 8th February 2000 The Taj MahalThe Taj Mahal, located near the Indian city of Agra, is one of the world's greatest architectural treasures. The almost supernatural beauty of the Taj Mahal and its grounds transcends culture and history, and speaks with a voice of its own to visitors from all over the world of feelings that are common to all humanity.There are two stories of how the Taj came to be.The Taj's Love StoryIt has been called the most beautiful temple in the world, despite the fact that it was built at the cost of much human life. The Taj Mahal is a real monument of one man's love for a woman. The story is a sad one, told many times. But it never hurts to tell it again.In 1631, when his wife died in childbirth, the emperor Shah Jahan brought to Agra the most skilled craftsmen from all Asia and even Europe, to build the white marble mausoleum that is the Taj Mahal. He intended to build a black marble mausoleum for himself, and the link between the two was to be a silver bridge. This fantastic plan suffered a dramatic and permanent setback when the Shah himself died.Its stunning architectural beauty is beyond description, particularly at dawn and at sunset when it seems to glow in the light. On a foggy morning, it looks as though the Taj is suspended in mid-air when viewed from across the Jamuna river.This is, of course, an illusion. The Taj stands on a raised square platform with its four corners truncated, forming an unequal octagon. The architectural design uses the interlocking arabesque concept, in which each element stands on its own and perfectly integrates with the main structure. It uses the principles of self-replicating geometry and a symmetry of architectural elements.If you don't want the huge crowds to distract you from your view, try arriving just as it opens or is about to close. A few minutes alone in the perpetually echoing inner sanctum will reward you far more than several hours spent on a guided tour. Especially if your tour guide is Murbat Singh, who makes it his job to find a new comic slant on the Taj story every time he tells it.To really do the Taj Mahal justice, you should plan to spend at least a full day in the grounds, to see this stunning piece of architecture at dawn, midday, and at dusk. The colours and atmosphere of the gardens and the Taj itself constantly change throughout the day. Under moonlight the marble glows.The Taj's Other StoryIf you have ever visited the Taj Mahal then your guide probably told you that it was designed by Ustad Isa of Iran, and built by the Moghul Emperor, Shah Jahan, in memory of his wife Mumtaz Mahal. Indian children are taught that it was built in 22 years (1631 to 1653) by 20,000 artisans brought to India from all over the world.This story has been challenged by Professor P.N. Oak, author of Taj Mahal: The True Story, who believes that the whole world has been duped. He claims that the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz Mahal's tomb, but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya), worshipped by the Rajputs of Agra city.In the course of his research, Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace had been usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. Shah Jahan then remodelled the palace into his wife's memorial. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai Singh for Mumtaz's burial. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur is said to retain in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for the surrender of the Taj building.The use of captured temples and mansions as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers. For example, Hamayun, Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions.Oak's inquiries begin with the name Taj Mahal. He says this term does not occur in any Moghul court papers or chronicles, even after Shah Jahan's time. The term 'Mahal' has never been used for a building in any of the Muslim countries, from Afghanistan to Algeria.'The usual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal is illogical in at least two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani,' he writes. 'Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building.'Taj Mahal is, he claims, a corrupt version of Tejo-mahalaya, or the Shiva's Palace. Oak also says that the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists. Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting that the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era: Professor Marvin Miller of New York took samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveller Johan Albert Mandelslo, who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the city in his memoirs, but makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest that the Taj was a noteworthy building long well before Shah Jahan's time.Oak also points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief that the Taj Mahal is a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum.Many rooms in the Taj Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time, and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples.Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition with dire consequences.The only way to really validate or discredit Oak's research is to open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal, and allow international experts to investigate.